RESUMO
Background: In cancer patients with bone tumors, pathological fractures are a major concern. Making treatment decision for these patients requires an evaluation of fracture risk, which is currently based on semi-qualitative criteria that lack patient-specificity. Because of this, there exists a need for quantitative fracture risk prediction tailored to the patient's individual bone geometry. To address this need, this study aims to develop and validate a finite element (FE) technique that can be used to create patient-specific models and more accurately identify fracture risk. Model validation was performed using canine radii. Methods: Radii were harvested from eight canines euthanized for reasons unrelated to the study. A semicircular osteotomy was made in the distal portion of each bone to simulate tumor lysis. Samples underwent computed tomography (CT) scanning and were randomly assigned to loading groups for destructive mechanical testing. Three samples were tested in torsion, three in cantilever bending, and two in compression. FE models were created for each bone from the corresponding CT scan to replicate patient-specific geometry. Material properties were based on equations relating scan properties to elastic modulus. Boundary conditions and loads were added to the models based on the sample's treatment group. Stiffness and strain data were collected from both the mechanical testing and FE simulation, and yield load predictions were made based on maximum principal strain. Experimental and computational results were compared using a linear regression. Results: The FE models were most accurate in predicting stiffness, followed by strain, with yield load having the lowest accuracy. Linear regressions resulted in R2 values of 0.9335 for bending and compression and 0.8798 for torsion. Conclusions: The proposed FE technique is a valid method for predicting fracture in a canine model of osteosarcoma. This method could provide patient-specific, quantitative data to aid clinicians in decisions regarding surgical intervention for patients with bone tumors.
RESUMO
Background: Segmental large volume bone loss resulting from fracture or osseous neoplasia is a major challenge to orthopedic surgeons and there is an ongoing quest to identify treatments that optimize healing. To advance treatment, large animal translational models-such as the ovine critical-sized tibia defect model-are instrumental for testing of novel scaffolds for bone regeneration. However, little standardization in the implants utilized for defect stabilization has been determined and current commercially available implants may be inadequate to replicate the strength of the native tibia. We hypothesize that a 10-mm interlocking nail (ILN) would be stiffer in axial, bending, and torsional loading than its 8-mm counterpart and would be stiffer in axial and torsional loading compared to a 4.5-mm broad locking compression plate (LCP). Methods: Tibias were harvested from 24 ovine hind limbs from skeletally mature ewes euthanized for reasons unrelated to this study and were randomized to treatment group. An ex vivo comparison of a novel 10-mm angle-stable non-tapered ILN was compared to a commercially available 8-mm angle-stable tapered ILN and a broad LCP in an ovine critical-sized (5-cm) tibia defect model. Axial stiffness, torsional stiffness, and bending stiffness were determined in control intact tibia and tibial constructs in the three treatment groups. Following implantation, radiography was performed in all limbs and tibia length and cortical and medullary cavity diameter were measured. Comparisons between groups were assessed with a one-way analysis of variance. Significance was set at P<0.05. Results: The 10-mm ILN in tibia containing a 5-cm ostectomy gap most closely replicated the structural properties of intact tibia compared with other constructs. The 10-mm ILN had significantly stronger torsional (P<0.001) and bending (P=0.002) stiffness than the 8-mm ILN, and was significantly stronger than the LCP in axial (P=0.04) and torsional (P=0.01) stiffness. Conclusions: A 10-mm ILN used to stabilize an ovine critically-sized tibia defect most closely mimicked the structural properties of the intact tibia when compared to a 8-mm ILN or broad LCP. Further in vivo testing will aid in determining which stabilization method is best suited for testing of novel tissue engineering and bone healing studies.
